New Paper reports a concerned parent performing "investigations" into daughter's accident. I'm not sure if the dad knows that he's perverting the course of justice (obstruction of justice in US legal terms).
Update: Tip of the hat to Axl who found the background on this. The incendiary headline does not help matters.
Friday, November 28, 2008
Thursday, November 13, 2008
Toyota Premio
Been driving a Toyota Premio[1][2] lately and I think it's pretty nice... mid-size sedan between a Corolla and a Camry. It has 1.5L, 1.8L and 2L engine configurations and the one I drove is a 1.5L (1NZ-FE), rated at 81 kW or 110 PS @ 6,000 RPM. Peak torque 140 Nm (14.3kgm) @ 4,400 RPM.
On the road price of about 62K. Leather, keyless entry and reverse camera, only problem is the touch-screen display is in Japanese and Japanese radio band. Lots of cabin space and in the trunk. I'm impressed with the fuel economy though, 16.3 km/L mixed (the onboard computer stated 15.9 km/L)... it's due to the CVT. Main complaint is the rear drum brakes. But I would still recommend this car.
[1]http://toyota.jp/premio/
[2]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyota_Premio
On the road price of about 62K. Leather, keyless entry and reverse camera, only problem is the touch-screen display is in Japanese and Japanese radio band. Lots of cabin space and in the trunk. I'm impressed with the fuel economy though, 16.3 km/L mixed (the onboard computer stated 15.9 km/L)... it's due to the CVT. Main complaint is the rear drum brakes. But I would still recommend this car.
[1]http://toyota.jp/premio/
[2]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyota_Premio
Wednesday, November 12, 2008
Occam's Razor
So Tim sent a link that claims North Korea digitally doctored a photo to prove that their leader is in good health. It now turns out that Scientific American actually bothered to seek an expert's opinion and he is of the opinion that the photo was unlikely to have been faked.
Sometimes we think too far ahead... why would North Korea bother to do this since Kim supposedly has body-doubles anyway? It would be far easier to get a double to stand in for him in the first place.
Sometimes we think too far ahead... why would North Korea bother to do this since Kim supposedly has body-doubles anyway? It would be far easier to get a double to stand in for him in the first place.
Sunday, November 02, 2008
Greed and iTunes Music Store
When iTunes Store first debuted in 28 April 2003, it took them 8 days to sell 100K songs.
The one billion song milestone was reached on 22 February 2006, or 1301 days since the store was launched.
For the period between 22 Feb 2006 and 6 Jan 2007, or about 318 days, 1 billion songs were sold. Now, between 27 Feb 2008 and 19 Jun 2008, or 113 days, another billion songs were sold, marking the 5 billion song milestone. That is exponential growth. To put that in perspective, Firefox set a Guiness World Record for most software downloads in 24 hours... 8,002,530 in 24 hours or 5,557 per second at its peak.
iTunes Store is moving 6,145 songs per second every day, and is still growing.
If the projections hold up, the 6 billion song milestone was passed sometime in late September 2008.
Yet at approximately that time period, the RIAA was asking Apple to increase the royalty fees for each song sold despite making 70 out of every 99 cents[1][2]. Apparently earning US$4,300 per second was not enough for them.
The one billion song milestone was reached on 22 February 2006, or 1301 days since the store was launched.
For the period between 22 Feb 2006 and 6 Jan 2007, or about 318 days, 1 billion songs were sold. Now, between 27 Feb 2008 and 19 Jun 2008, or 113 days, another billion songs were sold, marking the 5 billion song milestone. That is exponential growth. To put that in perspective, Firefox set a Guiness World Record for most software downloads in 24 hours... 8,002,530 in 24 hours or 5,557 per second at its peak.
iTunes Store is moving 6,145 songs per second every day, and is still growing.
If the projections hold up, the 6 billion song milestone was passed sometime in late September 2008.
Yet at approximately that time period, the RIAA was asking Apple to increase the royalty fees for each song sold despite making 70 out of every 99 cents[1][2]. Apparently earning US$4,300 per second was not enough for them.
Tuesday, October 28, 2008
Webkit aka Safari Version 3.1.2 (5525.20.1) vs Minefield aka Firefox vers 3.1b2
Update: The current Webkit nightly r37894 is even faster than Minefield when it comes to the SunSpider Javascript benchmark.
They weren't joking when they said Javascript performance has been improved. Safari Version 3.1.2 (5525.20.1) as a comparison.
My setup: iMac 2.4 GHz/4 GB RAM/OS X 10.5.5
Download the latest Webkit nightly builds here.
Download the latest Minefield nightly builds here.
So it seems the Webkit nightly is now about 4x faster than Safari. :D
TEST COMPARISON FROM TO DETAILS
=============================================================================
** TOTAL **: 2.03x as fast 1511.6ms +/- 3.7% 745.0ms +/- 0.4% significant
=============================================================================
3d: 1.07x as fast 142.4ms +/- 2.5% 133.4ms +/- 0.8% significant
cube: 1.27x as fast 62.6ms +/- 3.6% 49.4ms +/- 3.8% significant
morph: *1.55x as slow* 33.2ms +/- 4.9% 51.6ms +/- 1.3% significant
raytrace: 1.44x as fast 46.6ms +/- 1.5% 32.4ms +/- 2.1% significant
access: 2.66x as fast 182.2ms +/- 18.6% 68.4ms +/- 2.1% significant
binary-trees: 5.17x as fast 47.6ms +/- 1.4% 9.2ms +/- 6.0% significant
fannkuch: 5.68x as fast 89.8ms +/- 38.1% 15.8ms +/- 3.5% significant
nbody: *1.15x as slow* 31.2ms +/- 1.8% 36.0ms +/- 2.4% significant
nsieve: 1.84x as fast 13.6ms +/- 5.0% 7.4ms +/- 9.2% significant
bitops: 1.36x as fast 53.2ms +/- 24.0% 39.2ms +/- 2.7% significant
3bit-bits-in-byte: *3.00x as slow* 1.6ms +/- 42.6% 4.8ms +/- 11.6% significant
bits-in-byte: - 9.8ms +/- 44.3% 7.2ms +/- 7.7%
bitwise-and: - 13.4ms +/- 53.9% 8.8ms +/- 6.3%
nsieve-bits: 1.54x as fast 28.4ms +/- 16.6% 18.4ms +/- 3.7% significant
controlflow: 8.71x as fast 36.6ms +/- 1.9% 4.2ms +/- 13.2% significant
recursive: 8.71x as fast 36.6ms +/- 1.9% 4.2ms +/- 13.2% significant
crypto: 1.50x as fast 65.0ms +/- 10.7% 43.4ms +/- 1.6% significant
aes: 2.54x as fast 34.6ms +/- 2.0% 13.6ms +/- 5.0% significant
md5: 1.53x as fast 23.0ms +/- 27.3% 15.0ms +/- 0.0% significant
sha1: *2.00x as slow* 7.4ms +/- 9.2% 14.8ms +/- 3.8% significant
date: 3.55x as fast 265.6ms +/- 0.4% 74.8ms +/- 0.7% significant
format-tofte: 4.73x as fast 148.4ms +/- 0.7% 31.4ms +/- 2.2% significant
format-xparb: 2.70x as fast 117.2ms +/- 1.4% 43.4ms +/- 1.6% significant
math: *2.02x as slow* 50.0ms +/- 5.0% 100.8ms +/- 0.6% significant
cordic: *1.45x as slow* 24.2ms +/- 9.2% 35.0ms +/- 0.0% significant
partial-sums: *2.91x as slow* 17.2ms +/- 6.0% 50.0ms +/- 0.0% significant
spectral-norm: *1.84x as slow* 8.6ms +/- 7.9% 15.8ms +/- 3.5% significant
regexp: 6.15x as fast 237.4ms +/- 0.6% 38.6ms +/- 1.8% significant
dna: 6.15x as fast 237.4ms +/- 0.6% 38.6ms +/- 1.8% significant
string: 1.98x as fast 479.2ms +/- 6.5% 242.2ms +/- 0.7% significant
base64: 1.04x as fast 20.6ms +/- 3.3% 19.8ms +/- 2.8% significant
fasta: 3.91x as fast 134.6ms +/- 22.6% 34.4ms +/- 2.0% significant
tagcloud: 1.30x as fast 112.8ms +/- 0.9% 86.6ms +/- 2.4% significant
unpack-code: 2.90x as fast 160.0ms +/- 0.5% 55.2ms +/- 1.0% significant
validate-input: 1.11x as fast 51.2ms +/- 2.7% 46.2ms +/- 4.4% significant
They weren't joking when they said Javascript performance has been improved. Safari Version 3.1.2 (5525.20.1) as a comparison.
============================================
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
--------------------------------------------
Total: 3082.4ms +/- 0.2%
--------------------------------------------
3d: 375.2ms +/- 0.4%
cube: 122.2ms +/- 1.1%
morph: 129.8ms +/- 0.8%
raytrace: 123.2ms +/- 0.5%
access: 486.4ms +/- 0.6%
binary-trees: 63.8ms +/- 1.6%
fannkuch: 230.8ms +/- 1.0%
nbody: 135.4ms +/- 0.5%
nsieve: 56.4ms +/- 2.5%
bitops: 425.4ms +/- 0.7%
3bit-bits-in-byte: 62.6ms +/- 1.1%
bits-in-byte: 94.4ms +/- 1.2%
bitwise-and: 164.2ms +/- 1.6%
nsieve-bits: 104.2ms +/- 0.5%
controlflow: 82.6ms +/- 0.8%
recursive: 82.6ms +/- 0.8%
crypto: 221.6ms +/- 0.5%
aes: 73.8ms +/- 0.8%
md5: 74.0ms +/- 0.0%
sha1: 73.8ms +/- 0.8%
date: 265.8ms +/- 0.5%
format-tofte: 122.6ms +/- 0.9%
format-xparb: 143.2ms +/- 0.4%
math: 417.4ms +/- 0.6%
cordic: 161.2ms +/- 0.6%
partial-sums: 179.6ms +/- 0.9%
spectral-norm: 76.6ms +/- 1.5%
regexp: 199.6ms +/- 0.3%
dna: 199.6ms +/- 0.3%
string: 608.4ms +/- 0.5%
base64: 89.2ms +/- 1.5%
fasta: 167.4ms +/- 0.8%
tagcloud: 122.4ms +/- 0.6%
unpack-code: 123.8ms +/- 0.4%
validate-input: 105.6ms +/- 1.1%
My setup: iMac 2.4 GHz/4 GB RAM/OS X 10.5.5
Download the latest Webkit nightly builds here.
Download the latest Minefield nightly builds here.
So it seems the Webkit nightly is now about 4x faster than Safari. :D
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)